Oil Pressure Control

Competition engines and 'live' projects only. Good photos to illustrate your post are expected.
Post Reply
helebah
Posts: 25
Joined: July 19th, 2006, 11:44 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Oil Pressure Control

Post by helebah »

Thanks for the great forum. If I install a Moroso Oil Accumulator, do I need to install a "Big Wing" Sump. From what I can gather from doing a few searches they do a similar function and seem to cost approximately the same so I am thinking I may not need both. Secondly is a thermosat essential to maintain oil temperature with an external cooler. It will be for a 1608 that mainly does hillclimbs or sprints.
Book 005
Guy Croft
Site Admin
Posts: 5039
Joined: June 18th, 2006, 9:31 am
Location: Bedford, UK
Contact:

Re: Oil Pressure Control

Post by Guy Croft »

No, in the light of my exp with the Lotus Lada at Hethel a few years back (very fast circuit trials with std 2 liter sump and accumulator only) I don't think you will, but do use an oil cooler and gauge and keep the oil temp to 85 deg C max or you will certainly run a bearing.
Of course if you can afford to make a b/w sump, so much the better - but me, I think I would not bother, just keep a careful watch on your oil pressure gauge and low pressure warning light. Do not trust the old OE gauges - get race ones like Raceparts or Stack.

Don't forget that the accumulator will exhaust itself on long turns, be careful would be my best advice.


GC
Attachments
2qt accumulator in Lotus Lada. Considering how fast it was driven, it's a testament to the effectiveness of the accumulator that it didn't blow-up...
2qt accumulator in Lotus Lada. Considering how fast it was driven, it's a testament to the effectiveness of the accumulator that it didn't blow-up...
Engine bay 1.jpg (64.94 KiB) Viewed 8228 times
Lotus Lada instrumentation was good, driver barely glanced at them I'd say. That's top racing drivers, no mechanical sympathy..
Lotus Lada instrumentation was good, driver barely glanced at them I'd say. That's top racing drivers, no mechanical sympathy..
Lada Interior R.jpg (33.99 KiB) Viewed 8226 times
FIAT125T
Posts: 23
Joined: July 12th, 2006, 4:45 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Oil Pressure Control

Post by FIAT125T »

Whilst an oil accumulator is good, I use an Accusump, there is one problem to address with all standard sumps. I had a fatigue failure of the standard baffling in my sump which allowed uncontrolled oil surge. Do one of two things. Re-do the welds in your standard sump and check for cracking or replace the baffles with more extensive extended ones.
thank you
Paul
Keeper of a 125T the flyin' New Zealander Fiat.
Wal
Posts: 43
Joined: July 2nd, 2006, 7:22 pm
Location: Denham, Bucks, UK
Contact:

Re: Oil Pressure Control

Post by Wal »

Guy,
just to clarify. It is my understanding that the standard production (132 Argenta type) big sump is basically useless over anything more than fast road because it lacks any decent baffling etc. Thus the big wing sump to which you refer would be a custom built example, with baffles and trap doors, not the standard 132 type.

Thus an accumlator with any sump, regardless of the "big wing" claim, would be better. So that it is the accumulator that is inportant not the generic big wing sump.

Regards,
wal
Guy Croft
Site Admin
Posts: 5039
Joined: June 18th, 2006, 9:31 am
Location: Bedford, UK
Contact:

Re: Oil Pressure Control

Post by Guy Croft »

Well, more or less!

However the best wet-sump system would be a properly boxed and baffled sump (like my 'big-wing' type, yes, odd name but it was around long before I made them) with an accumulator too.



GC
Attachments
The 'wings' are the boxes on the side, that hold oil and make it to flow over the pickup on left-right turns. Trap door baffles are essential or the boxes will make the sump worse even than a standard one (like the Argenta sump..)
The 'wings' are the boxes on the side, that hold oil and make it to flow over the pickup on left-right turns. Trap door baffles are essential or the boxes will make the sump worse even than a standard one (like the Argenta sump..)
GC BW sump.JPG (17.92 KiB) Viewed 7763 times
some folks want these to reduce ground clearance, but the fact is you can't gain much..
some folks want these to reduce ground clearance, but the fact is you can't gain much..
GC StIII 2 liter Fiat with racing sump.jpg (139.68 KiB) Viewed 7767 times
TR-Spider
Posts: 132
Joined: June 23rd, 2006, 8:37 am
Location: Rekingen / Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Oil Pressure Control

Post by TR-Spider »

It is my understanding that the standard production (132 Argenta type) big sump is basically useless
Yes, that's what the Argenta sump is. From experience I would rate it worse than the standard 124 Spider 2L sump (in terms of cornering ability).

The reservoirs of a "big wing" type sump gives you additional time, before the Accusump kicks in.

As example, with a modified Argenta sump (baffels + trapdoors + windagetray-topcover).
When I drive fast around my favourite roundabout (lefthand corner-anticlockwise) and do a 270° turn, the following happens:
at about 150° the (too) small left-hand-side reservoir has evacuated completely and then the Accusump starts feeding oil in, which one can see from the oiltemperature significantly dropping (Accusump reservoir was ccooler). Out of the roundabout the oil temperature raises again to the level as before.

Thomas
GC_23
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests