Measured at 15mbar constant
Done by http://www.flow-improver.de
1)
1301cc standard manifold with 42mm throttel body
I 124,6 kg/h
II 127,0
III 128,4
IV 126,6
Max Delta 3%
2)
asymetric design with 52mm delta throttle body
I 152,0 kg/h
II 151,4
III 157,1
IV 153,2
Max Delta 3,6%
The flow is higher on the second, clear because of the bigger throttle body BUT the delta between the channels is only 0,6% more than stock!
I had never thought this.
2 different manifold designs for uno turbo on flow bench
-
Acki
2 different manifold designs for uno turbo on flow bench
- Attachments
-
- Here are the both
- Fiat_Turbo.JPG (55.72 KiB) Viewed 6883 times
-
the mk1 kid
- Posts: 12
- Joined: February 16th, 2007, 1:20 pm
- Location: Bristol, uk
- Contact:
-
Yugo_Turbo
-
Acki
-
chicken
- Posts: 3
- Joined: July 7th, 2006, 5:44 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Great write-up Acki. Good work and good info to share with everyone.
I believe that at a modest .5bar the sidedraught manifold design you have should be fine and give good fun without issue. There would be some matters to consider if you ever decided to increase the pressure. I understand your dilemma concerning plumbing and intercooling. Track cars=bigger intercooler, traffic cars=less plumbing.
Positive performance manifold design is similar to Nat-Asp only as far as having a power target. Different considerations are made for resonance, volumes, chamber dynamics, etc. etc. Basically the unit will be catering to a different type of machine. Some serious manufactures have solutions, but most require exceptional flow studies.
I do believe you will be very happy with your design in your present intentions though. And I'd love to see more pictures of your car and the turbocharger.
I believe that at a modest .5bar the sidedraught manifold design you have should be fine and give good fun without issue. There would be some matters to consider if you ever decided to increase the pressure. I understand your dilemma concerning plumbing and intercooling. Track cars=bigger intercooler, traffic cars=less plumbing.
Positive performance manifold design is similar to Nat-Asp only as far as having a power target. Different considerations are made for resonance, volumes, chamber dynamics, etc. etc. Basically the unit will be catering to a different type of machine. Some serious manufactures have solutions, but most require exceptional flow studies.
I do believe you will be very happy with your design in your present intentions though. And I'd love to see more pictures of your car and the turbocharger.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests
