aluminum radiator cores
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: June 26th, 2006, 10:53 am
- Location: Texas, USA
- Contact:
aluminum radiator cores
I have considered doing an aluminum radiator swap. I am not looking for a conventional swap job from a volvo or whatever. I need some advice on brands and types of cores out there. We will most likely buy a core and weld the tanks onto it along with hose fittings etc. I find usually on a product as popular as this getting real information is hard except from someone with hands on experience. Thanks,
-Jason Miller
Miller's Mule Machine and Design Inc.
Houston, Texas - USA
Miller's Mule Machine and Design Inc.
Houston, Texas - USA
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: June 18th, 2006, 9:31 am
- Location: Bedford, UK
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: June 22nd, 2006, 9:49 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
On some of the Morgan +8's i work on (which dont so much have a cooling system as a not overheating system!), i've fitted bespoke aluminium radiators, and seen a 10-15 degree C drop in running temperatures
Check out http://www.paceproducts.co.uk for ideas on cores etc
Check out http://www.paceproducts.co.uk for ideas on cores etc
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 23rd, 2006, 3:24 am
- Location: Mt Pleasant, WI USA
- Contact:
alum rad brand name
Jason
Ron Davis is a brand I know a 124 racers use this - Jim Scurria. And a bunch of Austin Healy Sprite guys with much success.
I recently decided to improve my cooling situation in my race car. I have Robert Rogers of ShadeTree putting a new 3-row copper core (VHT?) in a std 1.8L rad. Will fit stock fittings, look stock and is the set up he uses on all his race cars he supports. Plus his own car. Slightly less expensive than an alum rad.
BTW - with an alum rad - if you catch a stone - repair is a lot more difficult than copper.
FYI.
Don Tuscany
Ron Davis is a brand I know a 124 racers use this - Jim Scurria. And a bunch of Austin Healy Sprite guys with much success.
I recently decided to improve my cooling situation in my race car. I have Robert Rogers of ShadeTree putting a new 3-row copper core (VHT?) in a std 1.8L rad. Will fit stock fittings, look stock and is the set up he uses on all his race cars he supports. Plus his own car. Slightly less expensive than an alum rad.
BTW - with an alum rad - if you catch a stone - repair is a lot more difficult than copper.
FYI.
Don Tuscany
Don Tuscany
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 22nd, 2006, 6:45 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
You have 3 basic options:
Multi-core steel - which adds weight and is only a marginal improvement in cooling capacity.
Aluminium, single or dual core - lighter, more efficient thermal transfer but generally vulnerable to damage.
Copper core - commonly thought to be the ultimate but rarely proves to be the case. it is more efficient than aluminium but in order to get the strength and the required level of water flow it generally proves heavier than the aluminium equivalent.
Any of the three options can be made to spec. you decide size and flow rate, etc. just provide the drawings and they can build it. (I'm sure there are limitations but in practical terms there is nothing to worry about).
Personally I would go with aluminium, dual-core if you need it, as it offers the best compromise on size, weight and efficiency. Yes you need some degree of protection for it but this is not unusual for any radiator but essential for road use.
Multi-core steel - which adds weight and is only a marginal improvement in cooling capacity.
Aluminium, single or dual core - lighter, more efficient thermal transfer but generally vulnerable to damage.
Copper core - commonly thought to be the ultimate but rarely proves to be the case. it is more efficient than aluminium but in order to get the strength and the required level of water flow it generally proves heavier than the aluminium equivalent.
Any of the three options can be made to spec. you decide size and flow rate, etc. just provide the drawings and they can build it. (I'm sure there are limitations but in practical terms there is nothing to worry about).
Personally I would go with aluminium, dual-core if you need it, as it offers the best compromise on size, weight and efficiency. Yes you need some degree of protection for it but this is not unusual for any radiator but essential for road use.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: June 26th, 2006, 10:53 am
- Location: Texas, USA
- Contact:
Don, Robert was showing me a radiator like you described when I was up there last month -- maybe it was yours?
I'll be happy going with a dual core aluminum core and having the end tanks hand made and polished nice (I always like a touch of craftsmanship)
I may be able to make a little kit out of this. Many ask about converting but going to a junkyard and getting everything lined up is really alot of work especially for the minimal benefit the volvo style radiators bring (plus plastic ends).
A little more research has to be done though..
I'll be happy going with a dual core aluminum core and having the end tanks hand made and polished nice (I always like a touch of craftsmanship)
I may be able to make a little kit out of this. Many ask about converting but going to a junkyard and getting everything lined up is really alot of work especially for the minimal benefit the volvo style radiators bring (plus plastic ends).
A little more research has to be done though..
-Jason Miller
Miller's Mule Machine and Design Inc.
Houston, Texas - USA
Miller's Mule Machine and Design Inc.
Houston, Texas - USA
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 22nd, 2006, 6:45 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
Jason,
have you checked the alignment of the cores with the airflow? just a relatively minor detail but it can make a big difference in performance.
There are two schools of thought
1) Keep the cores aligned with the air flow as closely as possible (ie radiator is perpendicular to aperture - obviously dependent on quality of airflow since it may not be that obvious)
2) Keep the cores at an oblique angle but provide plenty of "extraction" from the back of the radiator. The idea is to force the air to slow down to gain maximum cooling effect from a relatively small radiator. A dual core rad in this situation is likely to be more of a problem than a boon.
Without the extraction a misaligned radiator just acts as a wall and the majority of the cooling capacity is wasted.
If you are having a radiator made it might be possible to correct a minor misalignment and make even more of a gain!
have you checked the alignment of the cores with the airflow? just a relatively minor detail but it can make a big difference in performance.
There are two schools of thought
1) Keep the cores aligned with the air flow as closely as possible (ie radiator is perpendicular to aperture - obviously dependent on quality of airflow since it may not be that obvious)
2) Keep the cores at an oblique angle but provide plenty of "extraction" from the back of the radiator. The idea is to force the air to slow down to gain maximum cooling effect from a relatively small radiator. A dual core rad in this situation is likely to be more of a problem than a boon.
Without the extraction a misaligned radiator just acts as a wall and the majority of the cooling capacity is wasted.
If you are having a radiator made it might be possible to correct a minor misalignment and make even more of a gain!
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 23rd, 2006, 3:24 am
- Location: Mt Pleasant, WI USA
- Contact:
alum rad followup
Jason
What you saw could have been mine... it is traveling my way this week. Julian has a good point on fin/air direction.
The Shadetree model by Robert has this issue address....from his racing experiences with Steve Cole and himself. However he has the core made this issue is optimized
Good Luck...no matter what you put in it will be an improvement.
What you saw could have been mine... it is traveling my way this week. Julian has a good point on fin/air direction.
The Shadetree model by Robert has this issue address....from his racing experiences with Steve Cole and himself. However he has the core made this issue is optimized
Good Luck...no matter what you put in it will be an improvement.
Don Tuscany
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: June 26th, 2006, 10:53 am
- Location: Texas, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 23rd, 2006, 3:24 am
- Location: Mt Pleasant, WI USA
- Contact:
Ron Davis Alum Radiator part number
Jason
From Jim Scurria - P/N for the Ron Davis unit he bought. Hope it is helpful
Don
Per Jim "In any case, I just bought a new aluminum radiator (16" x 22" 3 row). This is much bigger than my previous radiator. It's a Ron Davis radiator P/N 1A22163. About $250, including shipping. Beautiful piece of work. I'm working on mounting it now. Check it out http://www.rondavisradiators.com and see what you think"
From Jim Scurria - P/N for the Ron Davis unit he bought. Hope it is helpful
Don
Per Jim "In any case, I just bought a new aluminum radiator (16" x 22" 3 row). This is much bigger than my previous radiator. It's a Ron Davis radiator P/N 1A22163. About $250, including shipping. Beautiful piece of work. I'm working on mounting it now. Check it out http://www.rondavisradiators.com and see what you think"
Don Tuscany
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 23rd, 2006, 3:24 am
- Location: Mt Pleasant, WI USA
- Contact:
Ron Davis Alum Radiator part number
Jason
From Jim Scurria - P/N for the Ron Davis unit he bought. Hope it is helpful
Don
Per Jim "In any case, I just bought a new aluminum radiator (16" x 22" 3 row). This is much bigger than my previous radiator. It's a Ron Davis radiator P/N 1A22163. About $250, including shipping. Beautiful piece of work. I'm working on mounting it now. Check it out http://www.rondavisradiators.com and see what you think"
From Jim Scurria - P/N for the Ron Davis unit he bought. Hope it is helpful
Don
Per Jim "In any case, I just bought a new aluminum radiator (16" x 22" 3 row). This is much bigger than my previous radiator. It's a Ron Davis radiator P/N 1A22163. About $250, including shipping. Beautiful piece of work. I'm working on mounting it now. Check it out http://www.rondavisradiators.com and see what you think"
Don Tuscany
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: June 26th, 2006, 10:53 am
- Location: Texas, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: June 25th, 2006, 10:25 am
- Location: Banned 4th Oct 07 by GC
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 22nd, 2006, 6:45 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
Perhaps generalising slightly but a fan is not going to offer the same kind of airflow that you can achieve with just car movement. The only time the fan(s) should be working (if you have one) is when the car is sat stationary or in slow moving traffic.
From what I have seen of cooling fans you generally don't want more than one (usually on the back of the radiator) as you have a trade off in place. Putting the fan there reduces the available cooling by simply being an obstruction to airflow. If the car is going to spend *all* of its life at very low speeds then dual fans might be worthwhile but despite current trends in cities most cars generally travel a bit faster than that and when it comes to competition a lot faster than that!
Spending more time and effort on getting air flow through the engine bay is going to achieve far more - or perhaps moving the cooling system out of the engine bay if the engine is to be effectively "bottled up".
From what I have seen of cooling fans you generally don't want more than one (usually on the back of the radiator) as you have a trade off in place. Putting the fan there reduces the available cooling by simply being an obstruction to airflow. If the car is going to spend *all* of its life at very low speeds then dual fans might be worthwhile but despite current trends in cities most cars generally travel a bit faster than that and when it comes to competition a lot faster than that!
Spending more time and effort on getting air flow through the engine bay is going to achieve far more - or perhaps moving the cooling system out of the engine bay if the engine is to be effectively "bottled up".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests